Archives     Advertise     Editorial Calendar     Subscribe     Contact Us    



Accounting for Social Risk Factors in Value-Based Payment


 

Healthcare providers are becoming more responsible for ensuring the efficiency and quality of the care they provide to Medicare beneficiaries. The shift toward value-based payment models means that measurements of efficiency and quality of care are increasingly used to determine financial bonuses and penalties.

A recent report by a committee of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM, formerly the Institute of Medicine) --on which one of us served --finds benefits of adjustment of such measures for both clinical and social risk factors. Clinical risk factors are physiological attributes that can be associated with increased risk of certain diseases and health outcomes: they are already used to adjust quality and efficiency measures. Social risk factors are patient attributes such as low socioeconomic position, minority race or ethnic background, minority sexual orientation or gender identity, or living in a deprived setting.

Research has shown that these social risk factors influence health-related outcomes: patients with these attributes have worse health outcomes, and providers that disproportionately serve them appear to, as well. If they are not measured and adjusted for as clinical risk factors are, providers who serve disadvantaged populations could be unfairly penalized.1 In addition, providers might work to reduce the effects of social risk factors but doing so could require additional staff effort and costs. If social risk factors beyond providers' control are not accounted for, and providers serving disproportionate numbers of patients with high degrees of social risk are penalized, then disparities in health outcomes could widen.

Thus, in order to achieve the goal of accounting for social risk factors in Medicare payment programs and compensating providers fairly, the NASEM committee was commissioned to "specify criteria that could be used in determining which socioeconomic status factors should be accounted for in Medicare quality measurement and payment systems."1 The committee found that these goals could be reached with a combination of approaches. Specifically, depending on the measure and context, a combination of approaches might be used to account for social risk factors without masking real differences in performance. The approaches are:

  • Stratified public reporting by social risk factors within reporting units to illuminate how providers serve those with risk factors.
  • Adjusted performance measures to standardize estimates of quality.
  • Direct adjustment of payments to providers who disproportionately serve those with social risk factors.
  • Restructured payment incentives to reward improved quality or high-value care.

The committee also found that development of new data sources and methods of measurement would be beneficial in identifying indicators of social risk. Table 1 shows the five major categories of measures considered important by the committee, and specific examples of measures in each category, which may be ready for use. One example is that data are ready for use on dual eligibility for Medicare and Medicaid (an indicator of low income), and the Medicare program could use them to adjust measures of - and penalties for - hospital readmissions.


In addition, work to improve the accuracy of social risk data and use it for payment and quality measurement would likely benefit providers and patients in Nashville.1,2 Davidson County's poverty rate is higher than the U.S. average, and Nashville has a higher proportion of citizens who are members of minority races and ethnicities. 3 Accounting for social risk factors that a significant numbers of Nashvillians face would not only benefit the providers who serve these disadvantaged populations, but those directly affected by social risk factors themselves.

1 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Accounting for social risk factors in Medicare payment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2017.

2 Buntin, MB, Ayanian, JZ. Social Risk Factors and Equity in Medicare Payment. NEJM. 2017 Feb 9; 376:607-510.

3 People Living Below Poverty Level by Race/Ethnicity, Nashville TN. HealthNashville.org (2015). Retrieved: March 9, 2017, from www.healthynashville.org Data Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey. 2011-2015.


Melinda Buntin, PhD is a Professor of health economics and the Chair of the Department of Health Policy at Vanderbilt University's School of Medicine. More about her Department can be found at https://medschool.vanderbilt.edu/health-policy/ or by following @VUHealthPol.





Aiden Lee is a senior at Vanderbilt University studying Medicine, Health, and Society with a concentration in Health Policies and Economies.








 
Share:

Related Articles:


Recent Articles

Post-Flu Risks A Growing Concern For The Elderly

Infectious disease experts are warning that flu can lead to an increased risk of heart attack, stroke and disability in elderly patients for months after they have recovered from their illness.

Read More

Meharry & HCA Join Forces for Training Physicians

Meharry students to train in HCA system.

Read More

Hospital Groups File Lawsuit To Stop Significant Payment Cuts For 340B Hospitals

Today, the American Hospital Association (AHA), the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) and America's Essential Hospitals filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to prevent significant Medicare payment cuts for hospitals that participate in the 340B Drug Pricing Program.

Read More

CMS proposes policies to lower the cost of prescription drugs and combat the opioid crisis

The proposed rule eliminates administrative hurdles to providing more affordable prescription drugs and will allow Medicare to combat opioid overprescribing and abuse.

Read More

Tax Reform & Healthcare

Medicare cuts and repeal of the individual mandate are two areas of tax reform directly impacting healthcare.

Read More

Senate HELP Committee Hearing on Gene Editing Technology

On Nov. 14, the Senate health committee held a hearing on the gene editing method CRISPR to learn more about the technology from expert witnesses, which included Dr. Matthew Porteus, associate professor of Pediatrics at Stanford University; Katrine Bosley, CEO and president of Editas Medicine; and Dr. Jeffrey Kahn, director of the Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics at Johns Hopkins School of Public Health.

Read More

Nashville Health Care Council Hosts Panel Discussion on Pharma/Provider Collaborations in Health Care

On Nov. 13, the Nashville Health Care Council hosted a panel discussion on collaborations between the pharmaceutical and healthcare provider sectors and how those collaborations can drive change in healthcare.

Read More

Tennessee Health Care Hall of Fame Class of 2017

Six healthcare luminaries were recently inducted into the Tennessee Health Care Hall of Fame.

Read More

NMGMA 10 Minute Takeaway

Nashville Medical News recently had the opportunity to chat with new NMGMA president Joy Testa.

Read More

Tennessee Joins Medical Licensing Compact

A new Tennessee law will make it easier for area physicians to practice across state lines beginning in 2019 as part of the Interstate Medical Licensure Compact.

Read More

Email Print
 
 

 

 


Tags:
Aiden Lee, Melinda Buntin, Quality Care, Risk Adjustment, Social Determinants of Health, Social Risk Factors, Value-Based Reimbursement, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, VUMC
Powered by Bondware
News Publishing Software

The browser you are using is outdated!

You may not be getting all you can out of your browsing experience
and may be open to security risks!

Consider upgrading to the latest version of your browser or choose on below: